Page 1 of 1
New Premium Amenity Kit

Posted:
01 Mar 2007, 14:02
by G-VOPS
As of 15th March Premium Economy will feature a new amenity kit.
Awaits many topics on the matter.[:w]

Posted:
01 Mar 2007, 14:16
by Neil
Originally posted by G-VOPS
As of 15th March Premium Economy will feature a new amenity kit.
Awaits many topics on the matter.[:w]
Not many topics, but a quite long one
here about the new W kit.

Neil

Posted:
01 Mar 2007, 16:31
by porsche911
Oh GJ , I think they are working on your weakness - We need to find you help , and quick - maybe everybody should chip in for a UC return trip to Barbados so you an recover - but then again the temptation in UC with their new improved "Kit" may push you over the edge again!!!!!

Posted:
01 Mar 2007, 16:45
by DMetters-Bone
[^][^][^]
GJ glad you never disappoint! [}:)]
Do you feel better now?

Posted:
01 Mar 2007, 16:53
by porsche911
GJ , you really do need to talk to somebody " or drool on them".
1 - Maybe good therapy would help
2 - Fly with Thai and the Amenity kit will be last thing on your mind
3 - Same idea but with Singapore
4 - Simply forget about those damn kits and complain about the food.
Keith

Posted:
01 Mar 2007, 17:18
by porsche911
Good man yourself GJ - Did you hear that London Bus are looking at Amenity kits as well for all passanger?
It will include a wipe - to clear up the vomit from the previous passanger from the night before - An instrument of somesort to pick up anmd dispose of the "used" needles - and on certain long haul routes - a bullet proof vest.
They are also possibly introducing a business class for passangers to use for long haul trips over 3 hrs - this applies to routes over 2 miles away-
Keith
Keith

Posted:
01 Mar 2007, 17:51
by porsche911
That makes 2 of us then

Posted:
01 Mar 2007, 18:02
by preiffer
Hmm...
While I'm enjoying the prospect of Keith's mind imploding through the stress of seeing someone else post a topic that replicates another, at the request of GJ - jingly-jangley granted. [y]
Please continue discussion in the topic referenced in the first reply. Thanks.