Page 1 of 1

Baggage allowances - Asia - Why so low

PostPosted: 10 Jul 2007, 11:36
by jimbob247
Flying UC to NRT soon, just notices I can only take 30kg against 96kg if I was flying to the US,

How come?

PostPosted: 10 Jul 2007, 12:15
by mike-smashing
Healthy cargo loadings on the Asian routes, or Maximum Take Off Weight issues, one would assume, as they are the normal reasons for this.

Mike

PostPosted: 10 Jul 2007, 12:30
by jimbob247
I have to say, asking pax paying £5,500 for a return trip only to have (effectivly) one suitcase it a bit tight....

PostPosted: 10 Jul 2007, 13:10
by PVGSLF
and you should see the excess charges on asian routes!!!

I beleive the main reason is the healthy freight loads.

PostPosted: 10 Jul 2007, 19:29
by hzv5wk
Just had the same issue flying to PVG. This is where BA wins hands down - First & Club World allow 3 bags max 23kg each (32kg until 30 Sept 07) irrespective of route. Even WT+ allows more than the VS UC limit[n]

My sister had flown out with BA for work and was amazed when she learnt of the VS limit "But I thought you were flying Upper?"

Cheers,
Brian.

PostPosted: 10 Jul 2007, 19:41
by jimbob247
Are they flexible, if my bag comes in at 32kg will they charge?

PostPosted: 10 Jul 2007, 20:41
by DMetters-Bone
You should be OK if it comes in at 32kgs, went going home via HKG our bags from HKG-SYD were 32kgs and 33kgs, and they were fine. As long as it is not over 32kg as the baggage handlers won't lift it.

Dominic

PostPosted: 10 Jul 2007, 20:55
by jimbob247
Good, we managed a 35kg this year, Jimbob247 Jnr started wailing at just the right time! It's a crap policy though (the 30kg), especially as the flight is only half full...

PostPosted: 10 Jul 2007, 23:39
by slinky09
Mixture of cargo, competition, profitability and consumer power is my guess, or just because they can. VS is merely following the market on this one I believe it applies to all carriers.

PostPosted: 11 Jul 2007, 09:17
by jimbob247
Well it doesn't apply to BA, as Brian mentioned...