V-Flyer

"We have chick flicks for our women travellers. It's very important to keep women in mind while designing the in-flight entertainment. We also offer chauffeur pick for women travelling first class" remarks Neha Lidder Ganju

Virgin Atlantic Airways.

Poor Neha. Failed his/her orientation class at VA.

Chuck-

and I love the way chick flicks are only for women... what about the pink pound?

Originally posted by Decker
and I love the way chick flicks are only for women... what about the pink pound?

Oooh sheer stereotypism ... some would find offensive ... I think yuo'll find pinkers are just as diverse as non-pinkers ... personally I like this film

hmmm where's the irony icon when you need it. The stereotyping was exactly the point. To spell it out - I was replacing one stereotype with another. HOWEVER being literal I am unsure as to whether pinkers are just as diverse as non-pinkers. This is almost predicated against by the fact that they make up a minority of any given sample group and thus have less potential for diversity. To spell this out let's assume that in any group of 20 people 3 are gay. The 3 can have 3 preferences, the 17 can have 17.

Would love to know how many professional women were involved with these marketing strategies

Thanks,
Sarah
Non-chick flick watcher.

Originally posted by HighFlyer
Would love to know how many professional women were involved with these marketing strategies

Thanks,
Sarah
Non-chick flick watcher.

By the looks of it, not that many! But then remember they may have surveyed the same people that though GNF was a good idea (not that we ever found one of them).

Thanks,
Richard
A Chick Flick Watcher.

Well either he is being badly misquoted or the guy is an idiot [V]

On the other subject, I don't think that is fair, every gay male and female I know love breasts, is there anyone that doesn't like breasts?

And no I am not putting a poll up in the OT forum for this.

Originally posted by Decker
hmmm where's the irony icon when you need it. The stereotyping was exactly the point. To spell it out - I was replacing one stereotype with another. HOWEVER being literal I am unsure as to whether pinkers are just as diverse as non-pinkers. This is almost predicated against by the fact that they make up a minority of any given sample group and thus have less potential for diversity. To spell this out let's assume that in any group of 20 people 3 are gay. The 3 can have 3 preferences, the 17 can have 17.

Ahh, irony, perhaps the link was too crude ... but then that's what straight men are [:p][:p][:p]

Originally posted by slinky09

Originally posted by Decker
hmmm where's the irony icon when you need it. The stereotyping was exactly the point. To spell it out - I was replacing one stereotype with another. HOWEVER being literal I am unsure as to whether pinkers are just as diverse as non-pinkers. This is almost predicated against by the fact that they make up a minority of any given sample group and thus have less potential for diversity. To spell this out let's assume that in any group of 20 people 3 are gay. The 3 can have 3 preferences, the 17 can have 17.

Ahh, irony, perhaps the link was too crude ... but then that's what straight men are [:p][:p][:p]

Too crude...no..not even close...you want cruse go...yeah like I would [:I]

Originally posted by slinky09
Ahh, irony, perhaps the link was too crude ... but then that's what straight men are [:p][:p][:p]

OK so by popular vote [:p][:p][:p] becomes the irony emoticon .