Page 1 of 1

VS A380 Specification Update

PostPosted: 20 Dec 2007, 13:20
by McMaddog

PostPosted: 20 Dec 2007, 13:28
by mike-smashing
Sounds like the usual PR bull to me.

Getting the most seats in is VS' priority. Otherwise, we'd have proper dedicated premium lavs for PE pax on the LHR 744 and 343s, and we wouldn't have grotty seats which are opened onto by toilets (very common on the Airbus).

Private rooms and doubles in Upper, yes I can see that. SQ have done it. Showers, possibly, but all that water for showers will add a lot of weight to the plane.

Mike

PostPosted: 20 Dec 2007, 14:21
by David_Doyle
Hmmm, yes.

Virgin can already say they have 'double beds' though they're nothing of the kind really, certainly not compared to the SQ Suites. I'm not sure what sort of double bed the PR people have at home.

Roulette and Blackjack could be board games in a box to be taken out and played at your suite table or on the bar [:p]

'private rooms' - isn't that the cockpit.....

We'll have to wait and see if what promised is what is delivered. I think we'll find the reality is very different.

David.

PostPosted: 20 Dec 2007, 17:15
by frangipan
Before the roulette wheels in UC, perhaps they might first decide to have decent meals, properly trained, monitored and motivated staff and a cleaning schedule which allows the premium seats occasionally not to look like bus stops ;-) Then, throw in a few red pillows, some flowers and a decent amenity kit and Bob's your uncle!

PostPosted: 20 Dec 2007, 18:07
by locutus
A few extra inches seat pitch in Economy would mean people would pick VS over other airlines, but again they just seem to focus on the upper class product.

PostPosted: 20 Dec 2007, 18:39
by Darren Wheeler
Originally posted by locutus
again they just seem to focus on the upper class product.


Cos that's where the money is. Perhaps they could strip the old metal down to a UCS-only flight and launch 'Virgin Executive'

PostPosted: 20 Dec 2007, 21:32
by Scrooge
Roulette....not a good idea, chips pilled up then you hit turbulence [:?]

I could see the bar being removed and a blackjack table being put in.

But then you have the whole regulatory thing and who handles the disputes?

The showers are a non starter, to much weight as Mike said.

If they start offering double beds then VS is really offering a first class product ?

As it stands, with the strike action by the CC all bets are off.

PostPosted: 20 Dec 2007, 21:47
by VS-EWR
Originally posted by Scrooge
Roulette....not a good idea, chips pilled up then you hit turbulence [:?]


Magnets.

[:D]

PostPosted: 24 Dec 2007, 15:16
by dickoon
Do you consider it plausible that the roulette and blackjack action might be [played on IFE rather than on real baize? Shades of Ryanair's old mooted gimmick, perhaps.

*ponders* Virtual casino games in Y and physical ones in UC might be fun and quite a cute way of differentiating the UC product...

PostPosted: 24 Dec 2007, 16:06
by honey lamb
Well I suppose Ryanair's scratch cards could be considered gambling [:w]