PE more profitable than UC

I just read in Australian Gourmet Traveller magazine, April 2008 edition, that based on square footage, PE generates more revenue than UC, according to VS's Margie Vary.

Apparently most PE pax are 50 plus high-end lesisure travellers who can't stand flying economy any more and have the wedge to do something about it.

Howard

Originally posted by Howard Long

Apparently most PE pax are 50 plus high-end lesisure travellers who can't stand flying economy any more and have the wedge to do something about it.

Howard

[:?] Hmmm.... I feel some affinity with that statement (it's the 'wedge' bit, that causes the problem)

Originally posted by Slipperman

Originally posted by Howard Long

Apparently most PE pax are 50 plus high-end lesisure travellers who can't stand flying economy any more and have the wedge to do something about it.

Howard

[:?] Hmmm.... I feel some affinity with that statement (it's the 'wedge' bit, that causes the problem)

It's the 50 plus bit that I have the problem with! [:p]

Originally posted by Howard Long
Apparently most PE pax are 50 plus high-end lesisure travellers who can't stand flying economy any more and have the wedge to do something about it.

Nailed me in one...[:w]

Well I feel like at this point, PE is more of an interesting product than UC. Now that the IFBTs have been removed, and that more carriers are adopting VS's style of seat, PE is the new 'revolutionary' product. I can't really see any other PE product that compares.

Originally posted by pjh
[quote
Nailed me in one...[:w]

Me too [ii]

It's just nice to be in a seat in PE which stops my head from falling all over the place.

Now, if only they cleaned away trays quicker I'd be happy.