Age is not the factor that defines ability directly, sure, maybe.
I do not find an argument based around an older pilot having more relevant experience than a younger pilot to be mostly valid. I feel that a pilot trained originally in a glass cockpit environment (from the first training flight) is better skilled than pilots first taught on round gauges. New flight students can fly a DA40 with the G1000 better than I, after there instrument rating. Those students can learn quicker in the CRJ sim; quicker than pilots who were taught in a round gauge based aircraft. G1000 students have better skill than gauge based pilots in the CRJ sim. There are the flight physiology things to consider too. Younger, healthier pilots handle thing quicker. Could go on for ages but.
MTSU/NASA will be publishing a report on this later this year.
My main point is to younger FAs having a greater appeal to a greater audience. We could vote but that is a jaded pool. Fly QANTAS or BA.
Let go back on topic but feel free to have the last word.
I do not find an argument based around an older pilot having more relevant experience than a younger pilot to be mostly valid. I feel that a pilot trained originally in a glass cockpit environment (from the first training flight) is better skilled than pilots first taught on round gauges. New flight students can fly a DA40 with the G1000 better than I, after there instrument rating. Those students can learn quicker in the CRJ sim; quicker than pilots who were taught in a round gauge based aircraft. G1000 students have better skill than gauge based pilots in the CRJ sim. There are the flight physiology things to consider too. Younger, healthier pilots handle thing quicker. Could go on for ages but.
MTSU/NASA will be publishing a report on this later this year.
My main point is to younger FAs having a greater appeal to a greater audience. We could vote but that is a jaded pool. Fly QANTAS or BA.
Let go back on topic but feel free to have the last word.