Originally posted by g-vred
I was just reading airliners.net and saw this topic on the two most competing airlines. Somebody had left this
"Agreed. If BA was, for one second, worried about competition from VS they would not give VS any support. Much as the Virgin/Branson publicity machine mocks BA, BA gives engineering, training and technical support to VS"
Is this true???
I am sure that VS does use some BA tech services particularly away from London. This is common amoung airlines where marketing strategies (eg, alliances) seemingly conflict with maintenance affinities. For example, ISTR seeing a number of times Cathay, a OneWorld alliance partner like BA, parked up at the BMI (Star Alliance) maintenance hangars in LHR.
One area I doubt VS would ever let BA have a finger in again is the reservations system, since BA used that to poach the VS pax during the dirty tricks campaign. Because BA ran the CRS, they knew the VS pax as they arrived in the VS supplied limos at the airport and then, as they dissembarked kerbside, would offer them First or Concorde seats if the pax endorsed their ticket to BA.
In addition, because the pax' phone numbers were on the limo booking within the CRS they were also cheeky enough to even call up to try to get them to switch to BA pretending to be travel agents.
I would deliberately avoid BA for several years during the 90's because of this, until the likes of John King and Colin Marshall finally left who were the chief honchos at BA at the time. Although these two were never proven to have any direct involvement, equally I would not particularly want to put my trust in an airline whose bosses purportedly didn't know (or denied) all this was going on.
Sorry to bring up the Dirty Tricks campaign again, but this was a part of aviation history that I feel should not be forgotten.
Cheers, Howard