Originally posted by Kraken
I think the banks / card issuers look for small amounts that the fraudsters charge to cards to "test out" the account. I had First Direct call me last year as I'd spent Û10 in a hotel in France for WiFi access from Orange France. They called me before they would tell who the authorisation was from, they only knew the amount & it had been flagged as it was a very low spend amount.
Not been my experience. Hubby's card was cloned (and we still haven't figured out quite how) a couple of years back. Found out when we checked online and there were 3 amounts, all on the same date and in the south of France (never been there!) - totalling around £8,000. No small amounts were tested before that. Someone here mentioned being contacted by fraud to question whether a small transaction was theirs, but why, oh why, didn't any of these fraudulent amounts flag up somewhere as being an unusual spending pattern for Rob (hubby). We did ask this when we spoke to fraud, they just said these checks are random. Random???? For me, it just brought home how much money cc companies are losing to fraud all the time - we had no problem with the amount being frozen and refunded, but nonetheless, it makes you feel violated in some way.
I would never mind it if a cc company called me, to check I was in possession of the card (and my senses) and was actually making a particular purchase. Am sorry about this for you Decker - I guess it also means that card had been frozen and you now await a new one....[n]