This is the main V-Flyer Forum for general discussion of everything related to flying with Virgin-branded travel companies.
#418323 by RichardMannion
13 Sep 2007, 22:26
Originally posted by preiffer
Bit of an 'out-of-the-box'/radical idea, but why not consider giving yourselves a £119/year pay rise, immediately?

Stop paying Amicus' directors THEIR huge salaries (no, they're NOT in it just for 'the greater good of Mankind' [ii]) and pocket the cash yourselves... [:w][:?]


Good point - their latest AR (well I say latest as it's up to year ending 2005):
http://www.amicustheunion.org/PDF/finan ... 202005.pdf

makes an interesting read for sure. Talk about licence to print money, as they still get their annual membership fees even if they don't help get what it's members want as a payrise.

No idea how the general secretary manages on a £152k/year package. Must be that £39,463 of 'other benefits'. And that's is 2005 rates, would love to find a newer or older AR to see what the differences....
#418385 by easygoingeezer
14 Sep 2007, 15:14
Just got this from customer services.



Dear Customer

Thank you for your email.

Virgin Atlantic can confirm that its Cabin Crew have rejected a recent pay offer made by the company. We would like to reassure our passengers that we are determined to search for a settlement and are confident an agreement can be reached.

Our crew are famous for the way they look after our customers and we know they would not want to do anything that would deliberately damage the reputation of the airline or unnecessarily worry our passengers over their important summer holiday plans. At present we can confirm that we plan to run a full schedule of flights.

We look forward to welcoming you onboard.
#418386 by fozzyo
14 Sep 2007, 15:44
Originally posted by preiffer
Bit of an 'out-of-the-box'/radical idea, but why not consider giving yourselves a £119/year pay rise, immediately?


Just a hunch, but I'm guessing your not really a fan of Unions are you Paul.
#418387 by preiffer
14 Sep 2007, 16:23
Not exactly. [:w]


Well, I struggle when people see them purely as 'white knights' against 'big bad corporations' (a story they love to tell).

At the end of the day, JUST LIKE Virgin Atlantic, they're a money making machine - otherwise, they wouldn't exist [;)]
#418395 by VS045
14 Sep 2007, 18:44
through mall nourishment


A bit too much 'mall nourishment' is sometimes the problem[;)]

45.
#418397 by Decker
14 Sep 2007, 19:32
Ah yes Paul - your dictionary skips 'altruism' doesn't it? Unions were not created to make money. The fact that they do is a by product not a primary aim. Although I am not comfortable with union heads earning those sorts of figures.
#418408 by preiffer
14 Sep 2007, 20:31
I'll take your 'altruism' and beat it down to a pulp with 'egoism'... [:w]

[;)]
#418414 by Decker
14 Sep 2007, 21:12
Sheesh spot the child of Thatcher [;)]. There is no such thing as society allegedly... :)
#418422 by napamatt
14 Sep 2007, 22:26
the poor exchange rates with the USA

Am I missing something here. Every other TR has people heading across the pond with extra suitcases, because everything is so cheap in the US, because of the good exchange rate.
#418423 by Decker
14 Sep 2007, 22:32
Guessing they're paid in local currency and wish to repatriate it rather than spend it.
#418453 by AlanA
15 Sep 2007, 12:04
Originally posted by Decker
Guessing they're paid in local currency and wish to repatriate it rather than spend it.


Well, if its for local expenses and they have finance left to bring back, they are getting more than enough already.
#418457 by McCoy
15 Sep 2007, 12:51
Originally posted by AlanA
Well, if its for local expenses and they have finance left to bring back, they are getting more than enough already.
On the few trips I shared with VS crew, approximately half took suitcases of pot noodles, etc, and lived in their hotel room for the down-route duration; choosing to use their down-route cash as effectively a supplement to their income, back home.
#418470 by mike-smashing
15 Sep 2007, 14:56
Basically, it's the individual crew member's per diem that is paid for downline subsistance, and it's up to the crew member what they do with it - whether they spend it in the downline location or put it in their pocket and bring it home.

Unfortunately, people - not just in the airline industry, but elsewhere - have a habit of adding allowances into the basic package, and I'm not just talking about employees here, I'm thinking about how even employers and recruiters roll up this sort of stuff into the 'package' to pad out the basic pay.

Someone mentioned altruism earlier. While there are some great service-minded individuals amongst the VS crew who contribute on this board, they don't have purely altruistic motives in doing their job. They are doing it so that they can pay their outgoings and afford a decent standard of living. It's not like it's a 'summer job'.

There seem to be a number of individuals on here who seem to begrudge the ability for people doing this job to earn a reasonable, living wage.

I wonder if they would be the same people who would be the first to complain when the level of service goes down because the low wages mean that it's not possible to hire the right calibre of people?

(Basically, if you pay a burger-flipping salary, you shouldn't be surprised when you get burger-flippers.)

So much money has to be invested in training for cabin crew that it's really a profession rather than just a job, and therefore there has to be a hidden cost in having a 'revolving door attitude' to staff retention.

Mike
#418473 by AlanA
15 Sep 2007, 17:27
Mike,
You need to look at other forums where the attitude of other airlines cabin crew is discussed, especially those whom the Virgin Cabin crew hold up as the wages they feel they should be getting.
Paying more does NOT get you a better service, only more expensive flights with the same attitude.
#418480 by Jon B
15 Sep 2007, 19:51
Originally posted by mike-smashing
Basically, it's the individual crew member's per diem that is paid for downline subsistance, and it's up to the crew member what they do with it - whether they spend it in the downline location or put it in their pocket and bring it home.

Unfortunately, people - not just in the airline industry, but elsewhere - have a habit of adding allowances into the basic package, and I'm not just talking about employees here, I'm thinking about how even employers and recruiters roll up this sort of stuff into the 'package' to pad out the basic pay.

Someone mentioned altruism earlier. While there are some great service-minded individuals amongst the VS crew who contribute on this board, they don't have purely altruistic motives in doing their job. They are doing it so that they can pay their outgoings and afford a decent standard of living. It's not like it's a 'summer job'.

There seem to be a number of individuals on here who seem to begrudge the ability for people doing this job to earn a reasonable, living wage.

I wonder if they would be the same people who would be the first to complain when the level of service goes down because the low wages mean that it's not possible to hire the right calibre of people?

(Basically, if you pay a burger-flipping salary, you shouldn't be surprised when you get burger-flippers.)

So much money has to be invested in training for cabin crew that it's really a profession rather than just a job, and therefore there has to be a hidden cost in having a 'revolving door attitude' to staff retention.

Mike


Absolutely spot on post[y]

Lets not forget that a rise in line with inflation is not a rise at all in the current economic climate - and I fail to see why the crew shouldn't seek to improve their overall package?

Jon B
#418483 by Denzil
15 Sep 2007, 22:06
Mike excellent post & one which i would expect Alan to respond to. Find it hard to see why Alan is a VS frequent flyer when he thinks so little of the service & the crew members.

One thing i must agree with (and oh how it pains me to agree with you Alan), is that some of the crew do have a bad attitude (look at me i'm the best, i work for VS). They do get noticed for this & in many cases WON'T get on in the job, we (that's any passenger, paying or non rev) just have to hope they leave.
#418491 by AlanA
16 Sep 2007, 11:07
Originally posted by Denzil
Mike excellent post & one which i would expect Alan to respond to. Find it hard to see why Alan is a VS frequent flyer when he thinks so little of the service & the crew members.

One thing i must agree with (and oh how it pains me to agree with you Alan), is that some of the crew do have a bad attitude (look at me i'm the best, i work for VS). They do get noticed for this & in many cases WON'T get on in the job, we (that's any passenger, paying or non rev) just have to hope they leave.

Denzil,
its quite simple.
Only two airlines with flat bed seats fly direct to Orlando, one being BA and the other Virgin.
Out of the two, VS give you a great clubhouse and a longer bed.
Out of the two BA give you better food.
I have found both sets of crew to be the same, efficient at doing their job.
There are some great Virgin (and BA) cabin crew but that should be the way they all are. I am fortunate not to have to fly in Economy and when you read the attitude of Crew members on other sites who all hate this MCO route and their perceived attitude to the customers in all classes of travel, its hard to be sympathetic to any complaint from them.
As a frequent flyer of over 12 years I feel I do have the right to critiscise bad attitudes and poor service, as I have spend tens of thousands of my own hard earned pounds to fly this way.
In my industry, like many others, we have had to forego pay rises, even inflationary pay increases and the removal of personnel to survive in todays world.
I increasingly get irritatetd by people who think that they only have the 'right' to an inflation plus pay rise, we ALL have to live and have to cut our cloth to what is actually available, not what we think we are worth.
This future strike is about being paid more than inflation, and no reduction in staffing levels.
Its time you looked at the real world, with the 9 million people actually not working in this country, the millions not getting any pay rise whatsoever, the millions on a much less favourable pay and benefits structure than yourself and look at what effect your withdrawing of your labour will have on them.
Would I fly Virgin IF they had paid the cabin crew more instead of spending the money on the Clubhouses, better Upper Class, better PE and Economy seating? No, probably not.
Nothing has changed since you were given your pay terms and conditions when you joined Virgin, nothing has changed to the many new staff joining Virgin crew at the moment. Yet this strike is all about forcing Virgin to pay you more at the expense of those hard working joes using your service to get to their once in a lifetime two weeks.

I have to say I find Mike's comments quite insulting to the 'burger flippers' as if they are all stupid and lazy!
When terms and conditions are agreed by Cabin crew staff, as in any other buisness, it will be spelt out at that time the basic salary, the expenses and the other mryiad of extras you get. its not hidden.
Many industries will tell you that its not the salaries paid Mike, that provide hard workers, more that attitude. I know of many companies who are employing Eastern Europeans, as they have a work ethic now missing from British workers, at salaries British workers would not accept.
No-one owes anyone a living, and the airline industry is begginning to understand this. Its a pity Virgin strikers don't.

P.S Denzil, you might not belive this, but on other fiorums I am accused of being too pro Virgin and defending them too much!!! [:o)][:o)]
#418495 by mdvipond
16 Sep 2007, 13:26
Now that was a 'spot on post', Alan.
#418530 by VS045
16 Sep 2007, 16:47
Try to guess how I rated Alan's post...

[y][y][y]

45.
#418567 by Denzil
16 Sep 2007, 22:41
Alan, firstly i'm not VS CC, though 'i have a friend who is', so don't direct any of the dispute issues at me. Just like you it's my opinion, be it standard of crew, their attitude or pay problems.

If you have an experience of bad service or a bad attitude, put it writing & advise the FSM. As you say 'There are some great Virgin (and BA) cabin crew but that should be the way they all are', i agree 100% with this but bad staff do get through the selection system & the more the airline & competition grows the harder it will get to employ 'the cream of the crop'.

So with the above in mind would you ask that the rest of the VS CC dip out on a pay deal because of the 'bad eggs'?? Though perhaps 'pay deal' is the wrong phrase to use!!! This is not all about money, one issue is monthly stand-by. Under the new deal 4 months out of every 3 years is standby. This is an issue that many, especially parents, are unimpressed with.

You mention terms & conditions, do you think this has remained the same for the last twenty odd years?? Just as in any other industry workloads have increased & roles have changed.

Is striking the answer (in my opinion), no. Is any of the talk of striking etc doing the airline any good, no. If my memory serves me rightly the only people ever to gain from strikes was the Police during the coalminers strike years ago.
#418586 by vscss
17 Sep 2007, 09:56
originally posted by Alan

Nothing has changed since you were given your pay terms and conditions when you joined Virgin, nothing has changed to the many new staff joining Virgin crew at the moment


Excuse me Alan, but alot has changed to my role on the aircraft as FSM since I joined the airline.....have you not heard of 9/11??

1:Our job is much more dangerous now than it ever was, we have a million new security procedures now than we ever had (As you can expect I cannot go into detail) and can I just remind you who is the last line of defence from someone trying to take over the aircraft...Yes the CREW. That flight deck door will not be opened for anyone now, no matter what is going on in the cabin...Its up to the crew to defend the pax and aircraft.

2:Air rage has doubled in the last 10yrs, we have to deal with more abusive, drunk and violent pax EVERY flight. Who is going to restrain these pax?? Yes the CREW.

3:The class of pax has changed dramatically since the intro of low cost airlines...people who could only afford to go to Butlins can now go to Barbados.....need I say more??!!

So Alan, please do not insult me or my crew until you can truly understand the real reason why crew are on an aircraft..Primarily for YOUR safety and security.
#418587 by easygoingeezer
17 Sep 2007, 10:07
Originally posted by vscss
originally posted by Alan

Nothing has changed since you were given your pay terms and conditions when you joined Virgin, nothing has changed to the many new staff joining Virgin crew at the moment


Excuse me Alan, but alot has changed to my role on the aircraft as FSM since I joined the airline.....have you not heard of 9/11??

1:Our job is much more dangerous now than it ever was, we have a million new security procedures now than we ever had (As you can expect I cannot go into detail) and can I just remind you who is the last line of defence from someone trying to take over the aircraft...Yes the CREW. That flight deck door will not be opened for anyone now, no matter what is going on in the cabin...Its up to the crew to defend the pax and aircraft.

2:Air rage has doubled in the last 10yrs, we have to deal with more abusive, drunk and violent pax EVERY flight. Who is going to restrain these pax?? Yes the CREW.

3:The class of pax has changed dramatically since the intro of low cost airlines...people who could only afford to go to Butlins can now go to Barbados.....need I say more??!!

So Alan, please do not insult me or my crew until you can truly understand the real reason why crew are on an aircraft..Primarily for YOUR safety and security.



I could take every point at face value in this post, however I don't think its cabin crews responsibility nor do I think I'm comfortable with Cabin Crew on planes evaluating the 'class' of clientelle, this one comment actually strengthens other opinions that 'some' cabin crew are being less than professional with customers.

I was right there with ya until you mentioned 'class of people', you are in a union right, your supposed to be working class.
#418590 by fozzyo
17 Sep 2007, 10:25
Originally posted by vscss
3:The class of pax has changed dramatically since the intro of low cost airlines...people who could only afford to go to Butlins can now go to Barbados.....need I say more??!!


That really did make me laugh.
#418596 by vscss
17 Sep 2007, 10:56
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by vscss
3:The class of pax has changed dramatically since the intro of low cost airlines...people who could only afford to go to Butlins can now go to Barbados.....need I say more??!!

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Sorry I meant to say 'type of pax'[:#]
#418598 by easygoingeezer
17 Sep 2007, 11:00
Originally posted by vscss
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by vscss
3:The class of pax has changed dramatically since the intro of low cost airlines...people who could only afford to go to Butlins can now go to Barbados.....need I say more??!!

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Sorry I meant to say 'type of pax'[:#]


Splitting hairs now, lol. If you've dug a hole my advice is to stop digging.
Virgin Atlantic

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 172 guests

Itinerary Calendar