#764722 by Decker
21 Jan 2011, 22:53
Meh I'll continue to book with BA were appropriate. Looking at the last 8 flights it's been VSx1 BAx2 IBx1 so...

Suspect any strike will be a complete damp squib
#764726 by buns
21 Jan 2011, 22:58
No doubt Mr McClusky will want to co-ordinate with Mr Crow, so that Planes, Trains, Tubes and buses all come out together for the royal Wedding and anything else that damages peoples enjoyment

Makes you proud to be British

buns
#764738 by northernhenry
21 Jan 2011, 23:27
But overall if the deals are there, and the overall incentive for FF remains, will pass as another blip on the grand scheme of things..for pax
Last edited by northernhenry on 21 Jan 2011, 23:55, edited 1 time in total.
#764742 by honey lamb
21 Jan 2011, 23:37
Yawn!
#764785 by CHill710
22 Jan 2011, 15:02
as long as i get away for my weekend trip at the end of April otherwise i may have to go back to booking to fly with the orange one out of LGW rather than flying from LHR as it is easier.
#764787 by Alex V
22 Jan 2011, 15:48
I will continue to fly BA as a protest against those disgraceful CC (albeit a tiny minority now) who want to bring BA to its knees.
Besides disruption is becoming more limited with every strike, therefore the strikers should be happy to have a job and should take a look at the 2.5million unemployed who would love a job right now.

Cheers

Alex
#764790 by Bill S
22 Jan 2011, 16:05
Not such a tiny minority voted to strike - over 40% of the CC.
But a very small minority will actually take action - it mostly seems a tactic to cost BA money and market share.

BA share price shows just how much notice the markets take - down only 8% on year's high. Still showing a 220% profit from when I bought less than 2 years ago :)

It might just put off a few bookings - should help keep the wolf from VS doors.
#768710 by Bill S
23 Feb 2011, 11:30
Then they will find another excuse for not taking action - or do something that forces BA to declare the ballot illegal.

BASSA are not interested in strike action when only a few will do anything and the airline will fly almost as normal.
They are only interested in attempting to cause commercial damage. Doesn't matter about the harm they cause to their own members.

Eventually BA board and shareholders will say "Enough" and take action themselves.
#768717 by spiceke
23 Feb 2011, 13:16
It must be hurting them.

I for one decided to fly lufthansa to Berlin in April as I don't want a short break ruined in any way.

And I am a shareholder !!!!!
#768811 by catsilversword
24 Feb 2011, 06:49
BA staff must be fed up to the back teeth with it all. I know I would be... these 'leaders' are no more than trouble-makers, after all. Their behaviour reminds me of petulant toddlers who've been naughty, then been warned a treat will be taken away if they don't tow the line. As it has here, with travel perks. It isn't as if they didn't know this would happen - if they were less militant, it could all have been avoided.

But that isn't their reason for being, it seems....
#768814 by Jacki
24 Feb 2011, 09:08
I'm booking flights to Bangkok and Hong Kong at the moment and have not looked at BA for either as I want to limit the chance of missing the connections.
#772908 by HWVlover
28 Mar 2011, 15:25
#772947 by Ford
28 Mar 2011, 19:23
All quiet on the strike front when I booked April trip for whole family to HK back in January - but I suspected the lure of another major holiday would be too much. As a result I didn't even consider booking BA, even though I have had very pleasant Business Class flights in the past. Booked UC Virgin and now very relieved. Sadly I can't see myself booking BA again - Uncertainty is just not a strong selling point. These days - holidays = threat of BA strikes. How you know a school break is coming up!
#772948 by Scrooge
28 Mar 2011, 19:28
Here is the thing, get the feeling that BA and WW want them to strike, BA have had enough time now that they can cover flights with no disruption.

I think they are just waiting for a strike to happen and life at BA to go on as usual, if that happens then the union is done, the union knows this as well, hence the ballot not being an official strike vote.
#772957 by tontybear
28 Mar 2011, 19:57
Saw a report on the news earlier that with a new CE of BA (Walsh having been 'promoted' to manage the BA-Iberia merged company) and a new General Secretary of Unite there is an opportunity for both sides to 'reset' their relationships.

What is interesting is that Unite is still getting a 70%+ turnout and heavy majorities in all the votes. Whereas it is reported in the Evening Standard tonight that only 15 % of the Great British Public in London will plan on voting in the referendum in May.
#773033 by slinky09
29 Mar 2011, 07:09
tontybear wrote:What is interesting is that Unite is still getting a 70%+ turnout and heavy majorities in all the votes. Whereas it is reported in the Evening Standard tonight that only 15 % of the Great British Public in London will plan on voting in the referendum in May.


TB - I do not know what is more shocking, that BA staff continue to drive themselves out, or that you quote the ES as a reliable news source :0 :0 :0 !
#773108 by Bill S
29 Mar 2011, 17:12
9,700 crew polled, 83% of the 6,981 valid voting papers were for strike action.

5,811 crew voted for strike action, and 1,170 voted against. Turnout was 72% and only four invalid papers.

Compared to the 14000 BA crew ... 41.5% of the CC work force voted yes ... but how many will actually strike??

And the other big question - Have Unite actually managed to hold a legal ballot this time???

Expect them to announce dates ..... then cancel ...

BA contingency plans show few cancellations.
Virgin Atlantic

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests

Itinerary Calendar