This is the main V-Flyer Forum for general discussion of everything related to flying with Virgin-branded travel companies.
#109812 by mcmbenjamin
03 Apr 2006, 02:20
Originally posted by VS-EWR
Originally posted by slinky09
...the 345 that Singapore has does a 17 hr flight from JFK to SIA ...


EWR!!!


So true Nick BUT both my boarding passes for this flight say to or from 'New York -EWR'.
#109819 by slinky09
03 Apr 2006, 07:45
Originally posted by VS-EWR
Originally posted by slinky09
...the 345 that Singapore has does a 17 hr flight from JFK to SIA ...


EWR!!!


Sorry Nick - I should have known better [:(]
#109829 by preiffer
03 Apr 2006, 09:57
Originally posted by VS-EWR
EWR!!!
Nope. You've got me. (Have even tried the FAA for ideas) - Where's FWR??? ;)
#109837 by ColourPhil
03 Apr 2006, 11:15
Not sure if HNL would be profitable as not much biz traffic there apparently (why no one else does it!). Used to go there a lot in 80"s :D CO used to do HNL - LGW via DEN with a DC10. Did it once back from HNL in J, also did the DEN to LGW bit once. This aircraft used to have much smaller F and J cabins.
Still maybe they could do it from LGW, especially as they are rumoured to be basing a A346 there? Maybe a stopover in SFO or YVR would work. Don't believe any other airline flies from HNL to anywhere in Europe? Must be some scope for traffic from there for Hawaiian residents trying to get to Europe.
#109843 by VS-EWR
03 Apr 2006, 12:36
Originally posted by slinky09
Originally posted by VS-EWR
Originally posted by slinky09
...the 345 that Singapore has does a 17 hr flight from JFK to SIA ...


EWR!!!


Sorry Nick - I should have known better [:(]


Hehe, 'tis all right. [:p]
#109849 by G_NEUS
03 Apr 2006, 13:08
Hey VA

I need to go to Honolulu ideally from LHR or LGW in October so if you could get a fully working route up and running by August so I can book my tickets I'd be very grateful. Happy to fly in whatever class you provide.

(Just thought I'd let them know they would have one fare paying passenger. If we could find a few more I'm sure they would be up for it [y])
#109885 by AerJohn
03 Apr 2006, 19:41
Originally posted by ColourPhil
Still maybe they could do it from LGW, especially as they are rumoured to be basing a A346 there?


I dobt that this will be happening as the plan is for LHR to become an all airbus base eventually where as LGW and MAN will see the 747's
#110000 by willd
04 Apr 2006, 12:35
I have often wondered about HNL but as a connection to SFO as has been suggested here- do VH offer it is a destination?? But if it was to route SFO this would mean it would have to be an LHR service and as a b+s/honeymoon route HNL would be better suited to LGW...maybe a link up with Virgin America is the only way- if they ever ever get off the ground!

As for GIG- I believe that the UK government have just struck a deal with the BRazilians for another 2 carriers to operate a LON-GIG. TAM are the chosen BRazilian carrier- so its between VS and BD for the new route I guess- this of course can be always used to extend to EZE.
#110010 by mike-smashing
04 Apr 2006, 13:04
Originally posted by willd
As for GIG- I believe that the UK government have just struck a deal with the BRazilians for another 2 carriers to operate a LON-GIG. TAM are the chosen BRazilian carrier- so its between VS and BD for the new route I guess- this of course can be always used to extend to EZE.


Well, with there already being a Star Alliance carrier (Varig) doing LON-GIG, I'd be in favour of VS adding this to their route network!

Cheers,
Mike
#110014 by Jonathan
04 Apr 2006, 13:29
Some Canadian choices would be good Toronto or Vancouver?
#110037 by milehigh
04 Apr 2006, 17:09
LON-HNL problem would be crew duty periods... 2 x crews would be required losing 18 revenue seats less to sell. I think a A345 may just make it but limited cargo and less seats.. lessn seats means more £££££ to buy a ticket shame really.... personally Id like to see some South American routes!! bring on the Salsa, Corona and nachos
#110041 by BlackCat
04 Apr 2006, 17:16
I wouldn't mind VS competing with BA on the LHR-GIG/GRU-EZE route. Whenever I do this with BA the loads seem to be reasonable but it would take some investment I guess. It is a shame that there is no direct LHR-EZE flight (BA used to do LGW-EZE a few years back -- that was a long flight!).

BC
#110144 by willd
05 Apr 2006, 00:34
Yeh I reckon a South AMerican destination would be cool- fingers crossed it will be next!

As for YYZ- it would be great to see it back after it was dropped post 9/11.

Anyone know when PEK will start? Surely its about time it starts, next 6 months or so, aloowing VS to get use to operating the route prior to the Olympics.
#110153 by VS-EWR
05 Apr 2006, 02:10
GIG would be my bet as a possible new route, as BC noted. VS were essential in gaining cooperation between the UK and Brazil and they are already operating frequent charter flights there. It would probably be only a small and easy step to get GIG added as a full-time route.
#110178 by willd
05 Apr 2006, 10:11
Yeh especially as GIG-LON has just been given to TAM with the Brazilains saying that 2 British and 2 Brazilian carriers will fly the route
#110660 by slinky09
06 Apr 2006, 19:20
Anyone else see the news today that Air NZ will be flying Auckland-Honolulu-London? Apparently because their passengers complain about the security in LAX ... isn't Hawaii subject to the same security?
#110662 by Scrooge
06 Apr 2006, 19:28
Using what aircraft?

you sure it's not AUK-HNL-LAX-LHR using HNL to clear immagration?


btw How about Cancun for the B&S brigade?
#110683 by djuluvmee
06 Apr 2006, 20:22
The new Air New Zealand service is via Hong Kong
#110684 by slinky09
06 Apr 2006, 20:23
Originally posted by djuluvmee
The new Air New Zealand service is via Hong Kong


Yes doh! Now I see, however I read it in one of the papers this morning and they said Honolulu ... so not entirely my mistake!
#110691 by tommy212
06 Apr 2006, 20:37
LGW-CUN-MID

MID-CUN-LGW

They'd then have a very good MŽxican network all on 1 flight- including the CUN weddings/holidays market.

People looking for a more historical part of MŽxico would be flying to MID.

It would also steal a lot of MID's citizens who go to London via MEX on BA (they avoid the USA due to visas).

This would be a very profitable route for VS.
#110707 by mike-smashing
06 Apr 2006, 21:18
Originally posted by slinky09
Yes doh! Now I see, however I read it in one of the papers this morning and they said Honolulu ... so not entirely my mistake!


There were rumours of HNL before HKG, but it doesn't gain NZ anything to route via HNL.

NZ seem to have invested a lot of money and effort into improving the transit experience on NZ1/2 through LAX since the US suspended/withdrew Transit Without Visa, in any case - from the new lounge (which can be used by Business Class pax in transit), to a dedicated transit lounge with complimentary refreshments for Premium and Economy passengers. Pax going through the transit facility don't have to reclaim bags, too.

Interestingly, it looks like the existing AKL-HKG service operated on the 777 will continue to run, even once the AKL-HKG-LHR service starts up as well.

Cheers,
Mike
#110764 by willd
07 Apr 2006, 00:20
Mike do you have a source for a double daily HKG-AKL for NZ? I don't think that is correct as the 777 that is moving to AKL-HKG will then be moved to start AKL-PVG in October once the 747 is used on AKL-HKG-LHR.

HNL with regards to NZ is rumoured to be dropped with the extra a/c capacity going elsewhere. Latest rumour for NZ is Vancouver either direct from AKL or if they decide to keep HNL then via HNL.

----

As for VS services its got to be a new destination in South America- follwed by some b+s to the Indian Ocean???!!!???
#110777 by ela123
07 Apr 2006, 02:04
Cabin crew told me last Saturday that Chicago and Toronto were coming back in the autumn. Superb news if it happens [y]
Virgin Atlantic

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ScoobySu and 191 guests

Itinerary Calendar