Premier League 2009/10

This area is set aside for off-topic discussion. Everything that's absolutely nothing to do with travel at all... But please, keep it polite! Forum netiquette rules still apply.
Search
Reply

#723704 by willd
24 Aug 2009, 22:54
Am putting a brave face on everything at the moment.

Forget Man United missing Ronaldo, Liverpool are missing Alonso hugely. Sell Lucas, Babel and Voronin for sure.

Still I have faith, United didn't have the best start last year and still came good in the end. A long way to go.

#723705 by n/a
24 Aug 2009, 22:55
Midtablepool.

GJ

#723711 by Slipperman
25 Aug 2009, 03:10
quote:Originally posted by GrinningJackanapes
Midtablepool.

GJ


....Yeah

although shaky starts win premierships, IIRC. [:D]

#723712 by n/a
25 Aug 2009, 03:35
Oh, they may. I'm just having fun being a twunt. [:)]

GJ

#723735 by daywalker
25 Aug 2009, 10:17
Shaky starts are OK for teams/squads with recent experience of winning titles, I'm not so sure it's a good thing for teams that don't have recent experience of winning the title though.

#723738 by willd
25 Aug 2009, 10:32
quote:Originally posted by daywalker
Shaky starts are OK for teams/squads with recent experience of winning titles, I'm not so sure it's a good thing for teams that don't have recent experience of winning the title though.


I don't agree with you. Besides the Liverpool team are pretty good at turning things around when they are up against it.

#723763 by Slipperman
25 Aug 2009, 17:11
quote:Originally posted by GrinningJackanapes
twunt. [:)]




OT

'twunt'. love it!

as soon as I read it, it described my mate, Slimie, perfectly.

#723789 by daywalker
25 Aug 2009, 22:20
quote:Originally posted by willd
quote:Originally posted by daywalker
Shaky starts are OK for teams/squads with recent experience of winning titles, I'm not so sure it's a good thing for teams that don't have recent experience of winning the title though.


I don't agree with you. Besides the Liverpool team are pretty good at turning things around when they are up against it.

If they're so good at turning things around when they're up against it how come they have now gone three seasons without a trophy [?]
[:p]

#723841 by willd
26 Aug 2009, 12:47
quote:Originally posted by daywalker
quote:Originally posted by willd
quote:Originally posted by daywalker
Shaky starts are OK for teams/squads with recent experience of winning titles, I'm not so sure it's a good thing for teams that don't have recent experience of winning the title though.


I don't agree with you. Besides the Liverpool team are pretty good at turning things around when they are up against it.

If they're so good at turning things around when they're up against it how come they have now gone three seasons without a trophy [?]
[:p]





Am not even going to rise to that one.

#723863 by daywalker
26 Aug 2009, 16:55
quote:Originally posted by willd
quote:Originally posted by daywalker
quote:Originally posted by willd
quote:Originally posted by daywalker
Shaky starts are OK for teams/squads with recent experience of winning titles, I'm not so sure it's a good thing for teams that don't have recent experience of winning the title though.


I don't agree with you. Besides the Liverpool team are pretty good at turning things around when they are up against it.

If they're so good at turning things around when they're up against it how come they have now gone three seasons without a trophy [?]
[:p]





Am not even going to rise to that one.


I'm not baiting you wild, I'm just asking you to back up your claim of 'the Liverpool team are pretty good at turning things around when they are up against it' as I can't see the evidence of it from this current squad myself. Three years without a trophy is pretty good evidence of your claim being a false one [;)]

#723881 by n/a
26 Aug 2009, 19:22
Hahahaha...keep going willd and daywalker. I could watch this thread all season.

GJ

#723901 by Slipperman
27 Aug 2009, 03:28
quote:Originally posted by GrinningJackanapes
Hahahaha...keep going willd and daywalker. I could watch this thread all season.

GJ



I'm sure you will.[8D]

#724219 by willd
01 Sep 2009, 09:59
quote:Originally posted by daywalker
quote:Originally posted by willd
quote:Originally posted by daywalker
quote:Originally posted by willd
quote:Originally posted by daywalker
Shaky starts are OK for teams/squads with recent experience of winning titles, I'm not so sure it's a good thing for teams that don't have recent experience of winning the title though.


I don't agree with you. Besides the Liverpool team are pretty good at turning things around when they are up against it.

If they're so good at turning things around when they're up against it how come they have now gone three seasons without a trophy [?]
[:p]





Am not even going to rise to that one.


I'm not baiting you wild, I'm just asking you to back up your claim of 'the Liverpool team are pretty good at turning things around when they are up against it' as I can't see the evidence of it from this current squad myself. Three years without a trophy is pretty good evidence of your claim being a false one [;)]


I know your not [:D]. My comment was regarding games in which Liverpool go behind and come back, rather than in the league. At Liverpool we like to do things the hard way, let a team score a couple of scrappy goals and then have an uphill battle to get the win. Istanbul in 2005, Portsmouth, Fulham, Man City all last year and Bolton over the weekend. It is much more exciting than a boring 1-0 win trust me!

Just out of interest when was the last penalty awarded at OT to the visiting team?

#724243 by n/a
01 Sep 2009, 17:41
Not many penalties get awarded to the opposition at OT because at home the Red Devils are a controlled and efficient side. Sometimes, out of their home environment, they get shaky and do silly things that bring on penalties.

GJ

#724263 by daywalker
01 Sep 2009, 23:04
quote:Originally posted by willd
quote:Originally posted by daywalker
quote:Originally posted by willd
quote:Originally posted by daywalker
quote:Originally posted by willd
quote:Originally posted by daywalker
Shaky starts are OK for teams/squads with recent experience of winning titles, I'm not so sure it's a good thing for teams that don't have recent experience of winning the title though.


I don't agree with you. Besides the Liverpool team are pretty good at turning things around when they are up against it.

If they're so good at turning things around when they're up against it how come they have now gone three seasons without a trophy [?]
[:p]





Am not even going to rise to that one.


I'm not baiting you wild, I'm just asking you to back up your claim of 'the Liverpool team are pretty good at turning things around when they are up against it' as I can't see the evidence of it from this current squad myself. Three years without a trophy is pretty good evidence of your claim being a false one [;)]


I know your not [:D]. My comment was regarding games in which Liverpool go behind and come back, rather than in the league. At Liverpool we like to do things the hard way, let a team score a couple of scrappy goals and then have an uphill battle to get the win. Istanbul in 2005, Portsmouth, Fulham, Man City all last year and Bolton over the weekend. It is much more exciting than a boring 1-0 win trust me!

Just out of interest when was the last penalty awarded at OT to the visiting team?


[:D] No complaints here, Fletcher fouled him alright, thankfully the ref was like Wenger and Fergie at times, he didn't see it [:)] Having said that they scored from that incident so no real damage done, that doesn't excuse them not getting the pen of course, you know what I mean.

Recent penalties against Man Utd at OT:
Last season:-
Hull City Nov 08 (league)
Derby County Jan 09 (carling cup)
Liverpool Mar 09 (league)

Although I'm sure you knew of the last one, I bet you're surprised to see another two given against us at OT last season.

I back up GJ's observations on the penalties at OT though [y][:D]

We were crap again but got the points, can't complain but I can't stand to see us play like that, doesn't bode well for the season.

#725021 by n/a
12 Sep 2009, 18:10
Oh, no! Sunderland have beaten Hull 4-1! That's positively a slaughter. If I were a Hull fan, I'd be asking serious questions about how my side could have lost to those numpties. Are there any Hull fans that can give us some insights?

GJ

#725022 by n/a
12 Sep 2009, 18:12
And look what's happened to the Arsenal! Well, well, well...

GJ

#725024 by n/a
12 Sep 2009, 18:34
Aaaaaaaaaaaggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!

I'm glad Defoe plays for England!

GJ

#725026 by MarkedMan
12 Sep 2009, 19:13
And sad that Giggs never did ...

#725027 by n/a
12 Sep 2009, 19:34
Amen to THAT, markedman. He's one of the best arguments for an all-UK team (though in the end I don't support that scenario).

GJ

#725029 by DragonLady
12 Sep 2009, 19:44
quote:Originally posted by GrinningJackanapes
Oh, no! Sunderland have beaten Hull 4-1! That's positively a slaughter. If I were a Hull fan, I'd be asking serious questions about how my side could have lost to those numpties. Are there any Hull fans that can give us some insights?

GJ

The solitary Sunderland fan (amongst the rabble congregated here) resents the Black Cats being referred to as numpties [V][V].
DL

#725036 by n/a
12 Sep 2009, 20:35
Psssst...DragonLady...I'm overdramatizing just to be a little catty. Any side that would hire Roy Keane (for however short a time) as manager has my respect.

GJ

#725037 by n/a
12 Sep 2009, 20:36
ROLL ON YOU RED DEVILS!!!

Drinks on me down the COCK(erel) INN. See you there.

GJ

#725694 by n/a
19 Sep 2009, 17:57
Oh no! Hull are down 0-1 to the Blues. Hull are just outside the drop zone...again!!! Come on, Hull!

#725704 by n/a
19 Sep 2009, 21:07
Hull lose! Oh no! Now they are ALL THE WAY IN the drop zone!!!

GJ
Virgin Atlantic
Reply
Return to The Galley

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

Itinerary Calendar